United States v. Edwards ( 2023 )

| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO Plaintiff ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 6 ’ REMAINDER OF ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH 7 vs. PREJUDICE 8 DAVID J. EDWARDS, ET AL., 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 On March 5, 2020, the Court issued a stipulated order dismissing the Sixth Claim for 13 | Relief in this action. Doc. No. 65. There has been no docketed activity in this case in the three 14 | years since. 15 Plaintiff United States of America is, therefore, ORDERED to show in writing, within 10 16 | calendar days of the date of electronic service of this order, why the remainder of this action 17 | should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 18 If the United States fails to make that showing, or otherwise provide a meaningful response 19 |to this order within the period of time specified above, the remainder of this action will be 20 | DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this action will be CLOSED without further notice to the 21 parties. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423-24 (9th Cir. 1986) (affirming dismissal 22 | with prejudice for lack of prosecution). 23 94 IS SO ORDERED. 2p 25 Dated: _ March 6, 2023 : _-SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28