Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:21-cv-00850-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 13 | JEMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 22) 15 16 On September 14, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 With each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 22.) In light of the stipulation of the 18 parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 19 [11 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of 20 fosts or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 45 Pated: _September 15, 2022 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27