(SS) Hermosillo v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 AIDA HERMOSILLO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01467-NODJ-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION 13 APPOINTING AIDA HERMOSILLO AS v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF 14 V.M. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 (ECF No. 3) Defendant. 16 17 Aida Hermosillo, on behalf of minor Plaintiff, V.M., filed a complaint on October 12, 18 2023, challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying an application 19 for disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead 20 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) 21 On October 16, 2023, the Court denied the application without prejudice and ordered Plaintiff to 22 file a long form application. (ECF No. 4.) On November 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a long form 23 application. (ECF No. 5.) Finding Plaintiff failed to provide the Court with complete and 24 accurate information regarding her household income and expenses, the Court ordered Plaintiff 25 to file a revised long form application on November 6, 2023. (ECF No. 6.) On November 22, 26 2023, Plaintiff filed a revised long form application. (ECF No. 9.) On November 27, 2023, the 27 Court issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (ECF No. 11.) On December 1, 2023, Plaintiff paid the filing fee. 1 Based on the payment of the filing fee, on December 4, 2023, the Court withdrew the pending 2 findings and recommendations and directed the Clerk of the Court to issue a summons and new 3 case documents in this action, and to serve the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) 4 Now that the filing fee has been paid, the Court considers the petition to appoint Aida 5 Hermosillo (“Petitioner”) as guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiff V.M. that was filed 6 concurrently with the complaint. (ECF No. 3.) 7 Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a representative of a minor 8 or incompetent person may sue or defend on the minor or incompetent person’s behalf. Fed. R. 9 Civ. P. 17(c). This requires the Court to take whatever measures it deems appropriate to protect 10 the interests of the individual during the litigation. U.S. v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, 11 Situated in Klickitat Cty., State of Wash., 795 F.2d 796, 805 (9th Cir. 1986). The appointment 12 of the guardian ad litem is more than a mere formality. Id. “A guardian ad litem is authorized to 13 act on behalf of his ward and may make all appropriate decisions in the course of specific 14 litigation.” Id. A guardian ad litem need not possess any special qualifications, but he must “be 15 truly dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to litigate.” AT&T 16 Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1054 (E.D. Cal. 2015). This means that the 17 guardian ad litem cannot face an impermissible conflict of interest with the ward and courts 18 consider the candidate’s “experience, objectivity, and expertise” or previous relationship with the 19 ward. Id. (citations omitted). 20 “[W]hen a parent brings an action on behalf of a child, and it is evident that the interests 21 of each are the same, no need exists for someone other than the parent to represent the child’s 22 interests under Rule 17(c).” Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 1185 (S.D. Fla.), aff’d, 212 23 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000). While a parent is generally appointed as a guardian ad litem, there 24 are situations where the best interests of the minor and the interests of the parent conflict. 25 Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, No. 1:06-cv-01165 AWI NEW (TAG), 2007 WL 1390672, at *2 26 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007). Therefore, a parent is not entitled as a matter of right to act as guardian 27 ad litem for the child. Id., at *2. 1 | litem for V.M., and finds that no conflict that would preclude her serving as a guardian ad litem. 2 |(ECF No. 3.) The filing indicates V.M. is the child of Aida Hermosillo, and that Aida 3 | Hermosillo is a competent and responsible person that is willing to act as guardian and is familiar 4 | with the medical conditions of V.M. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Aida Hermosillo is appointed guardian ad 6 | litem for minor V.M. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAA (e_ 9 | Dated: _December 5, 2023 _ ef 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28