(PC) Hatton v. Cuisnot ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00020-DJC-JDP (PC) Sr., 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 KIMBERLY CUISNOT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is confined in a county care center and proceeding pro se, has 18 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 20 Local Rule 302. 21 On May 17, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any 23 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 24 days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 28 1 | (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 2 | district court and [the appellate] court....”"). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 3 | the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 4 | analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2023, are adopted in full; 7 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the required 8 | filing fee and failure to comply with court orders; and 9 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 | Dated: _June 17, 2023 _ Bek | Cbabeatin.. Hon. Daniel labretta 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28