Quezada v. State of California ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MIGUEL QUEZADA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00959-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 12 CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 13 PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 67) 15 16 17 On November 9, 2023, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 18 with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 67.) In light of the stipulation of the 19 parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 21 award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to the Court’s order on November 7, 2023, the Court 22 shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement, for 180 days after the parties’ November 9, 2023 23 request for dismissal, or until the settlement amount is paid, whichever is shorter. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 2 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□□□ 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 | Dated: _ November 13, 2023 ; ‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28