(PC) Overton v. Warden ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:23-cv-1833-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 05, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 05, 2023 (ECF No. 6) are 4 ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 7 | Date: December 4, 2023 /) 10 Na □ bios MM 11 Troy L. Nunley ] United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28