(PC) Dunson v. Shirley ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRENCE DUNSON, Case No.: 1:23-cv-0506 JLT SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION 13 v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO 14 HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 6) 16 17 Terrence Dunson, along with 17 other state prisoners, was originally a plaintiff in a civil 18 rights action entitled Thomas, et al., v. Shirley, et al., Case No.1:23-cv-00470-BAM (PC). On 19 April 5, 2023, the claims of the individual plaintiffs were severed and the Clerk of Court was 20 directed to open a separate action for Dunson’s claims, thereby initiating this action. (Doc. 1.) 21 Dunson was directed to file a signed complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal within 45 days, or 22 not later than May 24, 2023. (See id. at 4.) Dunson did not respond to the Court’s order. 23 On May 31, 2023, the magistrate judge found Dunson failed to comply with the Court’s 24 order and, in so doing, failed to prosecute this action. (Doc. 6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge 25 recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) The Findings and 26 Recommendations were served on Dunson by mail on May 31, 2023, and contained a notice that 27 any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service. (Id.) In addition, the Court advised Dunson the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his 1 | rights on appeal.” (d., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. 2 | Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) To date, no objections have been filed and the 3 | time to do so has expired. 4 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 5 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 6 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 7 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on May 31, 2023 (Doc. 6) are 8 ADOPTED in full. 9 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 10 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 b IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 | Dated: _June 21, 2023 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28