Breeding v. Walmart Inc. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Daniel Breeding, No. 1:23-cv-00300-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Walmart, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint is granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 | 15(a)(2) (‘The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.”); Foman v. Davis, 19 | 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (listing reasons to deny, none of which applies to this case). This order 20 | resolves ECF No. 12. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: November 15, 2023. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE