(PC) Bahena v. Robicheaux ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESMELING L. BAHENA, 1:22-cv-00788-ADA-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND 13 vs. (ECF No. 13.) 14 ROBICHEAUX, et al., ORDER INFORMING PLAINTIFF HE HAS LEAVE TO AMEND THE 15 Defendants. COMPLAINT ONCE AS A MATTER OF COURSE 16 THIRTY DAY DEADLINE TO FILE 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAINTIFF 19 20 21 22 23 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Esmeling Bahena (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 26 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 27 commencing this action on June 22, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) 28 On July 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the Complaint. (ECF No. 10.) 1 II. MOTION TO AMEND – FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) 2 Plaintiff may file an amended complaint at this stage of the proceedings without leave of 3 court. Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s 4 pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, 5 a party may amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party, and 6 leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Here, because Plaintiff 7 has not previously amended the Complaint and no responsive pleading has been served in this 8 action, Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint as a matter of course. Plaintiff shall be 9 granted thirty days in which to file a First Amended Complaint, making the needed changes. 10 Plaintiff must demonstrate in his amended complaint how the conditions complained of 11 have resulted in a deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. See Ellis v. Cassidy, 625 F.2d 12 227 (9th Cir. 1980). The amended complaint must allege in specific terms how each named 13 defendant is involved. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some 14 affirmative link or connection between a defendant’s actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo 15 v. Goode, 423 U.S. 36 (1976); May v. Enomoto, 633 F.2d 164, 167 (9th Cir. 1980); Johnson v. 16 Duffy, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978). 17 As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. 18 Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once an amended complaint is filed, the original 19 complaint no longer serves any function in the case. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in 20 an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently 21 alleged. 22 Plaintiff should note that although he has the opportunity to amend, it is not for the 23 purpose of adding allegations of events occurring after June 22, 2022, the date the initial 24 Complaint was filed. Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by adding new, unrelated 25 claims in his amended complaint. George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no 26 “buckshot” complaints). 27 /// 28 /// 1 The First Amended Complaint should be clearly and boldly titled “FIRST AMENDED 2 COMPLAINT,” refer to the appropriate case number, and be an original signed under penalty of 3 perjury. 4 III. CONCLUSION 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend, filed on July 21, 2022, is RESOLVED; 7 2. Plaintiff is informed that he has leave to amend the Complaint once as a matter of 8 course; 9 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, in which 10 to file a First Amended Complaint as instructed by this order, using the court’s 11 form; 12 4. The First Amended Complaint should be clearly and boldly titled “First Amended 13 Complaint,” refer to case number 1:22-cv-00788-ADA-GSA-PC, and be an 14 original signed under penalty of perjury; 15 6. The Clerk of Court shall send one § 1983 civil rights complaint form to Plaintiff; 16 and 17 7. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order may result in the 18 dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: September 22, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28