Richards v. United States of America ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | CRYSTAL RICHARDS, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00586-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 13 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 47) 15 16 On September 23, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 47.) In light of the stipulation of the 18 | parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 95 | Dated: _September 23, 2022 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28