(PC) Jones v. High Desert State Prison Policy ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, No. 2:23-cv-2142 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 22 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 23 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the 24 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court. 25 Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding 26 month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account. These payments will be forwarded by 27 the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in plaintiff’s account 28 exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 1 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 2 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 3 court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 4 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 5 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 6 The court has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and finds that it fails to state a claim upon 7 which relief can be granted under federal law. Plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed. The 8 court will, however, grant leave to file an amended complaint. 9 If plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, plaintiff must take care to write clearly and 10 coherently. The court provides the following information to assist plaintiff in drafting an 11 amended complaint. 12 1. In the amended complaint, plaintiff must demonstrate how the conditions 13 complained of have resulted in a deprivation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights. See Ellis v. 14 Cassidy, 625 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1980). Plaintiff must allege in specific terms how each named 15 defendant is involved. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some 16 affirmative link or connection between a defendant’s actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo 17 v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976). Furthermore, vague and conclusory allegations of official 18 participation in civil rights violations are not sufficient. Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 19 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 20 2. Plaintiff attempts to sue state entities such as High Desert State Prison. The 21 Eleventh Amendment serves as a jurisdictional bar to suits brought by private parties against a 22 state or state entity unless the state consents to such suit. See Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 23 (1979); Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978) (per curiam); Jackson v. Hayakawa, 682 F.2d 24 1344, 1349-50 (9th Cir. 1982). In the instant case, the State of California has not consented to 25 suit. 26 3. Plaintiff is informed that the number and type of claims he may include in his 27 amended complaint are limited. Under Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff 28 cannot bring unrelated claims against different defendants. Simply put, plaintiff cannot join 1 | claims against defendant B that have nothing to do with those brought against defendant A. 2 4. Plaintiff asserts violations of California law, but plaintiff fails to plead compliance 3 || with the California Tort Claims Act. Plaintiff is informed that before he may proceed on a claim 4 || arising under California law in this court he must comply with the terms of the California Tort 5 || Claims Act, and then plead compliance. See Cal. Gov’t Code § 910 et seq.; Mangold v. Cal. Pub. 6 | Utils. Comm’n, 67 F.3d. 1470, 1477 (9th Cir. 1995). Complaints must present facts 7 || demonstrating compliance, rather than simply conclusions suggesting as much. Shirk v. Vista 8 | Unified School Dist., 42 Cal.4th 201, 209 (2007). 9 5. Finally, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading to make 10 | plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be 11 || complete without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended 12 || complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). 13 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 14 1. Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is granted. 15 2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees 16 || shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the Director of the California 17 || Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. 18 3. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. 19 4. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended 20 || complaint that complies with the requirements of this order, the Civil Rights Act, the Federal 21 || Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the 22 || docket number assigned this case and must be labeled “Amended Complaint.” Failure to file an 23 || amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action 24 || be dismissed. 25 | Dated: October 17, 2023 □□ I / dle ae 26 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 271 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 jone2 142.14