Greene v. DePuy Orthopaedic ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSALIE GREENE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00987-ADA-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO COMPLY 14 DePUY ORTHOPAEDIC, et al., (ECF No. 27) 15 Defendants. DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 16 17 18 Plaintiff Rosalie Greene initiated this action on June 22, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On 19 September 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement. (ECF No. 26.) Accordingly, the Court 20 vacated all matters and ordered the parties to file dispositional documents by September 23, 2022. 21 (ECF No. 27.) The Court notes that the deadline to file dispositional documents has expired, but 22 nothing has been filed. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 24 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 28 2000). 1 The Court shall require the parties to show cause why sanctions should not issue for the 2 | failure to file dispositional documents in compliance with the Court’s September 2, 2022 order 3 | (ECF No. 27). 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The parties shall show cause in writing no later than September 30, 2022, why 6 monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to file dispositional 7 documents as required by the September 2, 2022 order; and 8 2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _September 27, 2022 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28