H.C. v. County of Kern ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 H.C., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00142-JLT-BAK 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO PERSONALLY APPEAR FOR OCTOBER 13 v. 19, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING 14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO 15 Defendants. SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING BY OCTOBER 12, 2022, AS TO WHY 16 SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THE FAILURE TO APPEAR AT 17 STATUS CONFERENCE 18 (ECF Nos. 27, 28) 19 20 Plaintiffs H.C. and A.C., as successors in interest to Graciano Ceballos, by and through 21 their guardian ad litem Dolores Hernandez; and adult Plaintiffs Ashley Ceballos, Emma 22 Ceballos, and Edward Ceballos, proceed in this action alleging excessive deadly force by sheriff 23 deputies against Graciano Ceballos, and violations of various federal civil rights and state laws. 24 (ECF No. 2-1 at 2-34.) 25 On August 8, 2022, the Court granted a motion for withdrawal of counsel, and Plaintiffs’ 26 former counsel were terminated from this action. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiffs are now proceeding 27 pro se, meaning without representation by attorneys. On September 16, 2022, the Court set a status conference to be held on September 28, 2022. (ECF No. 27.) The order contained 1 information on multiple methods of attending the status conference, however, Plaintiffs did not 2 appear via videoconference, nor in person at the courthouse, nor did they attempt to contact the 3 Court. (ECF Nos. 27, 28.) 4 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 5 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 6 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 7 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 8 including dismissal of the action. See, e.g., Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 9 (9th Cir. 2000); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). 10 Given Plaintiffs nonappearance at the September 28, 2022 status conference, despite 11 being provided clear information on how to appear or contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for 12 assistance, the Court shall order both a written response by October 12, 2022,1 and require the 13 Plaintiffs’ personal appearance in court on October 19, 2022, to show cause to the Court as to 14 why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to appear at the September 28, 2022 status 15 conference, and for the failure to prosecute this action. 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 1 The Court may vacate the October 19, 2022 hearing if the Court receives a sufficient written response, however, the Plaintiffs will not be relieved of their obligation to personally appear on October 19, 2022, until further order 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. An order to show cause hearing is set before United States Magistrate Judge 3 Stanley A. Boone on October 19, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; 4 2. Plaintiffs H.C.’s and A.C.’s guardian ad litem Dolores Hernandez, and Plaintiffs 5 Ashley Ceballos, Emma Ceballos, and Edward Ceballos, SHALL 6 PERSONALLY APPEAR on October 19, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 9 7 (sixth floor), of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, 8 Fresno, CA, 93721; 9 3. On or before October 12, 2022, Plaintiffs shall file a written response to this 10 order explaining why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to appear at 11 the September 28, 2022 status conference, and failure to prosecute this action; and 12 4. The failure to comply with this order will result in the imposition of monetary 13 sanctions, or other possible sanctions including dismissal of this action.” 14 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 16 | Dated: _ September 28, 2022 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 | 2 The parties may contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk Victoria Gonzales at vgonzales @caed.uscourts.gov or (559) 28 | 499-5672, with any questions or to obtain assistance in complying with this order.

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00142

Filed Date: 9/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024