(PC) Stebbins v. San Joaquin County Jail Health Care Services Medical Staff ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK LAMONT STEBBINS, No. 2:21-cv-1010 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HEALTH CARE SERVICES MEDICAL STAFF, et 15 al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 By order filed August 25, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has 20 not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 22 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 26 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 1 | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 2 || the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 || Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 4 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 5 | 1991). 6 | Dated: October 4, 2022 Foci) Aharon 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 /steb1010.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28