(PC) Fields v. Sanchez ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEVANTE FIELDS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01122-ADA-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRIORITY 14 J. SANCHEZ, et al., LEGAL STATUS 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 10) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Devante Fields (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On January 18, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations 22 to deny Plaintiff’s motion for priority legal status, which the Court construes as a request for 23 injunctive relief. (ECF No. 10). The Court found that Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements of 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(1); the Court lacked jurisdiction over non-parties; and 25 Plaintiff failed to satisfy the factors for the issuance of injunctive relief under Winter v. Natural 26 Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff 27 that he could file written objections to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time to do so has passed. 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 2 | de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 3 | and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, 5 1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 18, 2023, (ECF No. 10), are 6 ADOPTED in full; and 7 2. Plaintiff's motion for priority legal status, (ECF No. 8), is DENIED. 8 9 19 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: _ March 20, 2023 UNITED fTATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28