(PC) Birrell v. Fox ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROBERT W. FOX , et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 A suggestion of death upon the record pertaining to the death of plaintiff Sargent was filed 18 on July 6, 2022. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25, a motion for substitution of a 19 proper party must be made no later than ninety days after the death is suggested upon the record. 20 That time period has now expired, and no motion for substitution has been filed. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Sargent be dismissed. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after service of these findings and recommendations, any written objections may be filed with the 25 court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 | Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 2 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: October 11, 2022 Card ht fa he 4 CAROLYN K.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 birr1818.death.fr 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28