(HC) Ford v. Trate ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUINDELL FORD, Case No. 1:22-cv-01595-JLT-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING THE 13 v. PETITION WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 14 B.M. TRATE, CLOSE THE CASE 15 Respondent. (Doc. 14) 16 17 On May 31, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to 18 dismiss Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition with prejudice. The Court served the findings and 19 recommendations on Petitioner and extended to him 14 days to file objections thereto. More than 20 14 days have passed and as of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. The findings 21 and recommendations advised Petitioner that “failure to file objections within the specified time 22 may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Doc. 14); Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 23 (9th Cir. 1998). 24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this 25 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and 26 recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Based upon the foregoing, 27 the Court ORDERS: 1 1. The findings and recommendations issued on May 31, 2023 (Doc. 14) are ADOPTED 2 IN FULL. 3 2. Petitioner’s Quindell Ford’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) 1s 4 DISMISSED with prejudice. 5 3. Petitioner’s motions for Preliminary Injunction (Docs. 5, 11) and Declaratory 6 Judgment (Doc. 12) are DENIED as moot. 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 g | ITIS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ Jume 30, 2023 Cerin | Tower Wl TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28