(PC) Johnson v. Trinh ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILLIP JOSEPH JOHNSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00241-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 v. 14 TRINH, et al., (ECF No. 21) 15 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Phillip Joseph Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint has not yet 19 been screened. 20 On March 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF 21 No. 21.) Plaintiff states that he found out there were more defendants to add to the original 22 complaint, and since filing the original complaint, he has determined the names of more 23 defendants. (Id.) 24 Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s 25 pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. 26 Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse 27 party, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). “Rule 15(a) 28 is very liberal and leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires.” 1 AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysist West, Inc., 465 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 2006) (citation and 2 quotation omitted). However, courts “need not grant leave to amend where the amendment: 3 (1) prejudices the opposing party; (2) is sought in bad faith; (3) produces an undue delay in 4 litigation; or (4) is futile.” Id. 5 In considering the relevant factors, the Court finds no evidence of prejudice, bad faith, 6 undue delay in litigation, or futility. Plaintiff’s complaint has not yet been screened and no 7 defendants have been served or have appeared in this action. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to 8 amend shall be granted. Plaintiff has not specified how much time he needs to file his first 9 amended complaint, but the Court finds that thirty days is an appropriate deadline. 10 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint should be brief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), but it must state 11 what each named defendant did that led to the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, 12 Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678-79. Although accepted as true, the “[f]actual allegations must be 13 [sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . . . .” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555 14 (citations omitted). 15 Additionally, Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by adding new, unrelated 16 claims in his first amended complaint. George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no 17 “buckshot” complaints). 18 Finally, Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. 19 Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, Plaintiff’s amended 20 complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” 21 Local Rule 220. This includes any exhibits or attachments Plaintiff wishes to incorporate by 22 reference. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, (ECF No. 21), is GRANTED; 25 2. The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff a complaint form; 26 3. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, is due within 27 thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and 28 /// 1 4. If Plaintiff fails to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this order, this 2 action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: March 24, 2023 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28