(HC) Renteria v. United States ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONACIANO ANTONIO RENTERIA, No. 2:22-cv-01376-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Counsel for respondent has filed a request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 141. 18 ECF No. 16. The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publ’g Co. v. U.S. Dist. 19 Court for Dist. of Or., 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated 20 in the respondent’s Request, sealing the Request and Appendix pp 54-86 serves a compelling 21 interest. The Court further finds that the compelling interests identified by the respondent would 22 be harmed if the identified documents were not sealed. Finally, the Court finds that there are no 23 available alternatives to sealing the government’s Request and Appendix pp 54-86 that would 24 adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the respondent. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representations of counsel for 27 respondent, the Request to Seal (ECF No. 16) is granted. 28 2. Appendix pages 54-86 pertaining to petitioner Donaciano Renteria, and the ] Respondent’s Request to Seal, shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. 2 3. Electronic access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the United States, counsel 3 for petitioner, and court personnel. See Local Rule 141(a). 4 4. Counsel for respondent is directed to submit the request to seal along with the sealed 5 documents via e-mail to the Clerk of Court at the e-mail address for sealed documents 6 listed on the Court’s website, in a .pdf format as an attachment, with 7 days from the date 7 of this order. See Local Rule 141(e)(2)(a). 8 || Dated: June 30, 2023 ff ja } / } lg ps ANKE) flo ° CAROLYN K DELANEY? 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 12/rent1376.order2seal.final 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28