(PS) Prasad v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSHNI PRASAD, No. 2:22-cv-01505-WBS-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On May 15, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant filed objections on May 30, 20 2023, and they were considered by the undersigned. 21 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 22 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 23 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 24 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 25 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 26 the record and by the proper analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 15, 2023, are adopted; and 2 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 4, is denied. 3 | Dated: July 3, 2023 rh blew ak. (hi. 4 WILLIAMB.SHUBB 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28