(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN TAYLOR MAYS, No. 2:23-cv-2339 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 By order filed November 21, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days 19 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 24 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 1 | to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 || objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 || Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 || Dated: December 29, 2023 Foci) Aharon 6 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 || mays2330.fta 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28