(PC) Bailey v. Cox ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 ° UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 | TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A 10 v. RESPONSIVE PLEADING 11 | T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 25) 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 15 | action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 16 | 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 17 On March 23, 2023, Defendants, by way of special appearance, filed a request to extend 18 | the time to file a responsive pleading to allow the United States to arrange for representation and 19 | the filing of a response. 20 Good cause having been presented, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are 21 | granted sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order to file a response to the operative 22 | complaint. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. F- 2 ee 95 | Dated: _ March 27, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28