(PS) Aziz v. U.S. Postal Service ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FARZAD AZIZ, No. 2:20–cv–1200–MCE–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 16.) 14 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 On February 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18 16), which were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 21 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 22 novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 23 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 16) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. The action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: March 8, 2022 A ates LE hu rfl ASX, Xe: SENIOR UNITED STATES URTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28