Escobedo v. Vides Guardado ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00329-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO ADDRESS STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 12 v. AS TO NON-APPEARING DEFENDANT 13 MARIA GLORIBEL VIDES GUARDADO, (ECF No. 23) et al., 14 THREE DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 15 16 On September 6, 2023, a stipulation was filed by the appearing Defendants, dismissing 17 this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) One 18 Defendant, Maria Gloribel Vides Guardado Doing business as Mariscos El Patron Mexican 19 Food, has not appeared in this action. The filed stipulation does not specifically state whether 20 the claims against the non-appearing Defendant are to be dismissed with prejudice as well, 21 however, the filing does indicate that the action is to be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 22 Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ‘a plaintiff has an 23 absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a 24 motion for summary judgment.’ ” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 25 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 26 1997)). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an 27 action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 1 The Court shall require Plaintiff to advise the Court as to whether Plaintiff intends to 2 | dismiss the claims against the non-appearing party with prejudice as well. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within three (3) days of entry of this 4 | order, Plaintiff shall submit a notice of dismissal or other filing advising the Court of whether 5 | Plaintiff intends to dismiss the claims against the non-appearing Defendant with or without 6 | prejudice. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAA (e_ 9 | Dated: _September 7, 2023 _ ef 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:23-cv-00329

Filed Date: 9/7/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024