(PC)Gunn v. Solano County ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, No. 2:20-cv-02118-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATON COUNTY—MEDICAL CUSTODY DIVISION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a former county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 19 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On February 2, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff has 24 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 28 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 1 | Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 2 | the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 2, 2022, (ECF No. 17), are adopted 5 | in full; 6 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court orders, 7 | and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the April 23, 2021; and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 9 | DATED: March 9, 2022 10 { J) /) ul “ We Vokoy 12 Troy L. Nuhlep> 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28