Jordan v. Nor-Cal Pipeline Services ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | DAPHNIE JORDAN, No. 2:22-CV-00540-KJM-KJN 11 Plaintiff, ORDER 12 v. | NOR-CAL PIPELINE SERVICES, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 On July 29, 2022, this court issued an order directing the parties to submit, within thirty 20 | days, a motion seeking approval of their settlement agreement in accordance with Local Rule 21 | 230. ECF No. 7. Many months have since passed and the parties have filed no such motion. 22 | Thus, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be 23 | dismissed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Hernandez v. 24 | City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Henderson vy. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 25 | (9th Cir. 1986)). 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 DATED: March 30, 2023.