(PC) Michoff v. El Dorado County ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN DAVID MICHOFF, No. 2:17-cv-02584-MCE-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 EL DORADO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections 22 thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 45. Neither party has filed objections 23 to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 16, 2022, ECF No. 45, are 3 | ADOPTED in full; 4 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 35, is GRANTED; and, 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this 6 || case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 | Dated: March 18, 2022 Mater LEK hu rfl ASX, Xe: SENIOR UNITED STATES URTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28