(SS) Becerra v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSALINDA H. BECERRA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01658-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. (ECF Nos. 15, 16, and 18). 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On November 17, 2021, Plaintiff Rosalinda H. Becerra filed the present action in this court 18 seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of an application for Social Security Disability 19 Insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits for lack of disability. (ECF No. 20 2). On November 22, 2021, the Court issued an Order directing the parties, within ninety (90) 21 days, to complete and file a Consent to Magistrate Judge Assignment or Request for 22 Reassignment form. (ECF No. 6). 23 On October 24, 2022, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why 24 sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a consent or reassignment form. (ECF No. 25 15). On October 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed a consent/decline of U.S. magistrate judge jurisdiction 26 form. (ECF No. 16). On October 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause. 27 (ECF No. 18). Counsel for Plaintiff represented his failure to file the form was due to a calendaring error stemming from a software update to Counsel’s client case management system. 1 | at 2. Counsel for Plaintiff apologized for the oversight and asserts this failure falls under 2 | excusable neglect and should not result in sanctions. Id. 3 To determine whether neglect is excusable, a court must consider four factors: "(1) the 4 | danger of prejudice to the opposing party; (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on 5 | the proceedings; (3) the reason for the delay; and (4) whether the movant acted in good faith.” 6 | In re Veritas Software Corp. Sec. Litig., 496 F.3d 962, 973 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court finds 7 | Plaintiffs counsel’s failure to file a consent or reassignment form constituted excusable neglect 8 | and finds good cause to discharge the show cause order. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s October 24, 2022, order to 10 | show cause is (ECF No. 15) is DISCHARGED. 11 Db IS SO ORDERED. 13| Dated: _October 27, 2022 _ nr DR~ 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:21-cv-01658

Filed Date: 10/27/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024