Newmerzhycky v. Grant Mercantile Agency, Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] LEA NEWMERZHYCKyY, Case No. 1:21-cv-01040-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 14 GRANT MERCANTILE AGENCY, INC., (ECF No. 19) 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 1g | 19.)' In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 | 41(@)C1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 20 Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 | Dated: _ March 24, 2022 hy □□ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 ' The parties’ stipulation references Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), which provides for dismissal by court 27 order “on terms that the court considers proper.” However, the parties do not request imposition of any terms as part of the dismissal. Thus, the Court construes the parties’ filing as a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Rule 28 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) rather than a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2).