(PS) Bisi v. Chase Bank (USA) N.A. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY J. BISI, et al, No. 2:23–cv–01994–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC, D/B/A LAND ROVER 15 FINANCIAL GROUP 16 Defendant. 17 18 On October 20, 2023, defendant Land Rover Financial Group filed an amended motion to 19 dismiss.1 (ECF No. 16.) Defendant noticed its motion for a hearing to take place on December 5, 20 2023, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned. (Id.) Pursuant to this court's Local Rules, any 21 opposition to the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date 22 the motion was filed; i.e., by November 3, 2023. Further, a responding party who has no 23 opposition to the granting of the motion is required to serve and file a statement of non- 24 opposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“[a] responding party who has no opposition to the 25 granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the 26 motion in question”). That deadline has passed, and plaintiffs have not filed either a statement of 27 1 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Cal. 28 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 1 opposition or a statement of non-opposition. 2 A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a plaintiff's case 3 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), where that plaintiff fails to prosecute his or her 4 case or fails to comply with the court's orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the court's 5 local rules. See e.g., Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 6 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating that courts may dismiss an action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 41(b) sua sponte for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or comply with the rules of civil 8 procedure or the court's orders); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) 9 (“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action for 10 failure to comply with any order of the court”). 11 Here, plaintiffs, proceeding without counsel, have failed to file a written opposition or 12 statement of non-opposition by the required deadline, and therefore have not complied with Local 13 Rule 230(c). Further, plaintiffs’ failure to file any opposition indicates to the court that plaintiffs 14 may be consenting to the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 230(c) (“A failure to file a 15 timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.”). Thus, 16 plaintiffs’ claims are subject to dismissal. 17 Given plaintiffs’ pro se status, the court will not recommend dismissal at this time. 18 Instead, the court will vacate the December 5, 2023 hearing and provide plaintiffs one final 19 opportunity to either respond to defendant's motion to dismiss or to file a statement of non- 20 opposition. See L.R. 230(c) (“[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at 21 oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party....”). After the 22 expiration of the deadlines below, the court will decide the matter on the record and written 23 briefing only. Plaintiff is cautioned that any further failure to comply with the court’s Local 24 Rules and this order by failing to file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition will be 25 construed as non-opposition to the motion and will constitute additional grounds for dismissal 26 under Rule 41(b). 27 ////// 28 ////// 1 ORDER 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The December 5, 2023 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is 4 VACATED; 5 2. Within fourteen (14) days_of this order, plaintiffs shall file a written opposition to 6 defendant’s motion to dismiss, or a statement of non-opposition; 7 a. Plaintiffs’ failure to file a written opposition will be deemed a statement of 8 non-opposition to the pending motion and consent to the granting of the 9 motion, and shall constitute an additional ground for the imposition of 10 appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiffs’ entire case 11 be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 12 Procedure 41(b); and 13 3. Within seven (7) days of any opposition, defendant may file a written reply. 14 | Dated: November 28, 2023 1 ese A Abar 16 bisi.1994 KENDALL J.NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28