Martin v. Ford Motor Company ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK MARTIN, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00583-ADA-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 13 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 20, 21) 16 17 On August 25, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 41. (ECF No. 20.) In the stipulation of dismissal, the parties seek to dismiss 19 the action with prejudice, and stipulate that “the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the 20 settlement….” (ECF No. 20 at 2.) On August 28, 2023, the Court denied the parties’ request for 21 the Court to retain jurisdiction without prejudice. (ECF No. 21.) The Court ordered the parties 22 to file a renewed stipulated motion for the Court to retain jurisdiction over their agreement no 23 later than September 11, 2023. (ECF No. 21.) No renewed motion was filed and the deadline to 24 do so has expired. 25 Therefore, in light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. 26 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 27 been dismissed with prejudice. /// 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this 2 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 | Dated: _ September 12, 2023 ‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28