Nunn v. Bitwise Industries, Inc. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE NUNN, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00867-ADA-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS IN THIS MATTER AGAINST DEFENDANTS 13 v. BITWISE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND ALPHAWORKS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 14 BITWISE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362 15 Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE STATUS REPORT AS TO OTHER 16 SERVED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS AND READINESS TO PROCEED AS TO 17 OTHER DEFENDANTS INTO SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 18 THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 19 (ECF No. 7) 20 21 Plaintiffs filed this action on June 6, 2023, against Defendants: (1) Bitwise Industries, 22 Inc.; (2) AlphaWorks Technologies, LLC; (3) Jake Soberal; and (4) Irma L. Olguin, Jr. (ECF 23 No. 1.) On June 20, 2023, summons were returned demonstrating service was completed on 24 Defendants: 1) Bitwise Industries, Inc.; (2) AlphaWorks Technologies, LLC; and (3) Jake 25 Soberal, on June 14 and 15, 2023, with answers due July 5 and 6, 2023. (ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6.) No 26 answers have been filed, and no proof of service for Defendant Irma L. Olguin, Jr., has been 27 returned. On July 14, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a notice of suggestion of bankruptcy indicating that on June 28, 2023, Defendants Bitwise Industries, Inc. and Alpha Works Technologies, LLC, 1 each filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for 2 relief under chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). (ECF No. 3 7.) The bankruptcy cases are pending under case numbers 23-10845-TMH (Bitwise Industries, 4 Inc.) and 23-10847-TMH (Alpha Works Technologies, LLC). 5 Pursuant to Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, all actions against a defendant who has 6 filed a bankruptcy petition are automatically stayed once the petition is filed. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) 7 (staying “the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, 8 of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could 9 have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a 10 claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title.”); see 11 also Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937, 943 (9th Cir. 2010). 12 Plaintiffs additionally proffer that they are unaware of any bankruptcy petition filed by 13 the individual Defendants Jake Soberal, and Irma L. Olguin, Jr. (ECF No. 7 at 2.) A scheduling 14 conference is currently set for October 3, 2023. (ECF No. 3.) As noted above, no answers have 15 been filed by any Defendants, and no proof of service for Defendant Irma L. Olguin, Jr., has 16 been returned. Given this status and proffer, the Court will not vacate the scheduling conference 17 yet, and shall order Plaintiffs to file a status report within thirty (30) days indicating whether this 18 action should proceed in some manner against any of the named Defendants into the scheduling 19 conference or if this matter should be stayed in its entirety. See Parker v. Bain, 68 F.3d 1131, 20 1137 (9th Cir. 1995) (“All proceedings in a single case are not lumped together for purposes of 21 automatic stay analysis. Even if the first claim filed in a case was originally brought against the 22 debtor, section 362 does not necessarily stay all other claims in the case. Within a single case, 23 some actions may be stayed, others not. Multiple claim and multiple party litigation must be 24 disaggregated so that particular claims, counterclaims, cross claims and third-party claims are 25 treated independently when determining which of their respective proceedings are subject to the 26 bankruptcy stay.” (quoting Maritime Elec. Co. v. United Jersey Bank, 959 F.2d 1194, 1204–06 27 (3d Cir.1992))). 1 | setting the scheduling conference, and request default against any non-answering Defendant to 2 | the extent they are not subject to the automatic stay, in advance of the scheduling conference. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. All proceedings in this matter against Defendants Bitwise Industries, Inc., and 5 AlphaWorks Technologies, LLC, are STAYED pursuant to Section 362(a) of 6 Title 11, United States Code; and 7 2. Within thirty (30) days of service of this order, Plaintiffs shall file a status report 8 as to the Defendants Jake Soberal, and Irma L. Olguin, Jr., and indicating whether 9 this matter should be stayed in its entirety and all matters vacated, as described 10 above in this order. 11 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 13 | Dated: _ July 17, 2023 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28