(PC) Williams v. Rasey ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-0203 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIMISSING 13 v. CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 C. RASEY, (Doc. 37) 15 Defendant. 16 17 On February 23, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge determined that Plaintiff failed to 18 prosecute the action and did not comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 37.) Therefore, the 19 magistrate judge recommended this case be dismissed, without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) The 20 Findings and Recommendations permitted the parties fourteen days to file any objections. (Id.) 21 To date, no objections have been filed by either party and the time to do so has expired. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley 23 United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of 24 this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court finds the Findings and 25 Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 26 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated February 23, 2022 (Doc. 37) are 27 ADOPTED. 28 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 1 3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34) is terminated as moot; and 2 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, as this order terminates the matter 3 in its entirety. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 | Dated: _ March 29, 2022 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28