(PC) Smith v. Shasta County Jail ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES EDWARD SMITH No. 2:21-cv-00877-JAM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed September 1, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Following numerous extensions of time, on 19 March 1, 2022, the court granted plaintiff one last fourteen day extension of time to file his 20 amended complaint The allotted time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an 21 amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: April 4, 2022 Card Kt | / 4 L , ag. — 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12/smit0877.fta.docx 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28