Garza v. BG Retail LLC ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN P. GARZA, Case No. 1:22-cv-01051-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO KEVIN M. BADKOUBEHI TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 13 v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR PRACTICE IN THIS COURT WITHOUT 14 BG RETAIL LLC, FIRST SEEKING ADMISSION 15 Defendant. THREE-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 On August 22, 2022, the Clerk of Court directed attorney for Plaintiff, Kevin M. 19 Badkoubehi, to register for admission to this Court. (ECF No. 6.) To date, Mr. Badkoubehi has 20 failed to comply with this direction. 21 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 22 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 23 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 24 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 25 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 26 2000). 27 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within three (3) days of entry of this order, Mr. Badkoubehi shall show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned for 1 | failing to timely register for admissions to this Court. Mr. Badjoubehi may comply with this 2 | order by filing either (1) a status report outlining why he has failed to register for admissions, or 3 | (2) appropriate papers to register for admissions. Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to this 4 | Order to Show Cause may result in dismissal of this action. 5 | IT IS SO ORDERED. ° Dated: _ November 7, 2022 | ) Ww Me D R~ 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28