Mmeremikwu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] CHIMEZIE D. MMEREMIKWU, Case No. 1:22-cv-00356-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 14 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND 5 IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.., (ECF No. 8) Defendants. 16 17 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action. (ECF No. 8.)! In light of 18 the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 19 City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is 20 respectfully directed to close this case. 21 92 | ITIS SO ORDERED. 23 . - : Dated: _ April 11, 2022 [sf heey □□ 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 ' The parties’ stipulation does not state if the dismissal is with or without prejudice. “Unless the notice or stipulation 27 states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state- court action based on or including the same claim, a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits.” 28 | Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B).