(PC) Mustill v. Sacramento County Main Jail ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN E. MUSTILL, No. 2:21-cv-1720 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed March 4, 2022, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 19 days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 27 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 28 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 1 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: April 14, 2022 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 must! 720.fta 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28