(PC) Miller v. Mule Creek State Prison ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-01122 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated February 8, 2022, the court found plaintiff’s complaint failed to 18 state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 11.) The court dismissed the complaint and granted plaintiff 19 thirty-days leave to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended 20 complaint, request an extension of time, or otherwise respond to the court’s order within thirty 21 days. On May 24, 2022, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint or show cause 22 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court 23 orders within 30 days of the date of this order. (ECF No. 14.) A thirty-day deadline was set for 24 plaintiff to respond. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order 25 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) 26 More than thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not shown cause why this action 27 should not be dismissed, filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or 28 //// 1 | otherwise responded to the court’s orders. Accordingly, it will be recommended that this action 2 | be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute. 3 For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a 4 | district judge to this action. 5 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 6 | Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 7 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 8 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within twenty-one days 9 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 10 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 11 || to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 12 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 13 | Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 14 || Dated: November 22, 2022 16 U7 ‘BORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 DB:14 22 | DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/milll 122.fr_dism 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:21-cv-01122

Filed Date: 11/23/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024