(PS) Chiu v. Saechou ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:23-cv-00095-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 FARM FOW SAECHOU, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On May 17, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 18 served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) No objections were filed. 20 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 21 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 22 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 23 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 24 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 26 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 27 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. 28 ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 17, 2023 are ADOPTED; 3 2. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5 || DATED: July 21, 2023. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28