Hall v. Target Corp. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TORREY HALL, No. 2:22-cv-00937-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 14 TARGET CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 1, 2022, the previously assigned district judge issued an initial pretrial scheduling 18 order in this case. (Doc. No. 3). On August 25, 2022, this case was reassigned to the 19 undersigned, and that reassignment order provided that “[a]ll dates currently set in this reassigned 20 action shall remain pending subject to further order of the court.” (Doc. No. 4.) On December 1, 21 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation to extend certain discovery deadlines. (Doc. No. 6.) 22 Having considered the parties’ stipulation, and consistent with the undersigned’s scheduling 23 practices, the court hereby issues this amended scheduling order. 24 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 25 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 26 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 28 ///// 1 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 2 Pursuant to the court’s “initial pretrial scheduling order” previously issued in this case, the 3 deadline to seek leave to amend the pleadings or join any parties was “[w]ithin sixty (60) days . . . 4 from the date of removal.” (Doc. No. 3 at 2.) Because defendant removed this action on May 31, 5 2022 (Doc. No. 1), the filing deadline for any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend 6 the pleadings has since passed. 7 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of 8 court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 9 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). The parties are advised that the filing of 10 motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not imply good cause to 11 modify the existing schedule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(4); see also Johnson, 975 F. 2d at 609. 12 Moreover, any amendment requested under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) must not be: 13 (1) prejudicial to the opposing party; (2) the product of undue delay; (3) proposed in bad faith; or 14 (4) futile. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 15 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 16 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not relate to 17 sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred to the assigned 18 United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes subject to his or her 19 procedures. (The assigned magistrate judge’s initials follow the district judge’s initials next to the 20 case number.) All discovery documents must include the words “DISCOVERY MATTER” in 21 the caption to ensure proper routing. Do not direct delivery of courtesy copies of these 22 documents to the district judge. Counsel are directed to contact the magistrate judge’s courtroom 23 deputy clerk to schedule discovery matters for hearing. 24 All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the assigned magistrate judge’s 25 calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and the magistrate judge’s own 26 procedures. The written ruling of the assigned magistrate judge shall be final, subject to 27 modification by the district court only where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order 28 is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Local Rule 1 303, any party may file and serve a “Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of 2 Magistrate Judge’s Ruling.” See L.R. 303(c). The requesting party must file and serve any such 3 request within fourteen (14) days of service of a written ruling. L.R. 303(b). The request must 4 specify which portions of the ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and the basis for that 5 contention with supporting points and authorities. L.R. 303(c). 6 In addition, the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective 7 orders sought by the parties pursuant to Local Rule 141.1. However, requests to seal or redact in 8 connection with dispositive motions or trial are decided by Judge Drozd and any such requests 9 must comply with Judge Drozd’s Standing Order and Local Rules 140 and 141. 10 IV. DISCOVERY DEADLINES 11 A. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures 12 The parties have already made initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 13 Procedure Rule 26(a)(1). (Doc. No. 6 at 2.) 14 Any parties served or joined after the issuance of this scheduling order shall “make the 15 initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined,” as provided by Rule 26(a)(1)(D). 16 B. Fact Discovery 17 All fact discovery shall be completed1 no later than June 30, 2023, which is a date 18 requested by the parties. 19 The parties do not propose any limitations or changes to the governing provisions of the 20 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 C. Expert Discovery 22 Disclosures of expert witnesses, if any, must be made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C), and shall include all information required thereunder. Each 24 1 As used herein, the word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so 25 that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 26 been obeyed. The parties are advised that motions to compel must be filed in advance of the 27 discovery completion deadlines so that the court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the 28 discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 1 expert witness must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the 2 disclosures. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of 3 appropriate sanctions, including the preclusion of the expert’s testimony, or of other evidence 4 offered through the expert. 5 The parties shall disclose initial experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal 6 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than August 29, 2023, which is a date requested by 7 the parties. With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be 8 disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or 9 before September 28, 2023, which is a date requested by the parties. 10 All expert discovery shall be completed no later than October 30, 2023. 11 V. MOTIONS 12 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other 13 emergency applications, shall be filed on or before December 14, 2023 and shall be noticed for 14 hearing before Judge Drozd on a date not more than 60 days from the date the motion is filed and 15 on a date that is consistent with Judge Drozd’s Standing Order. Counsel are directed to refer to 16 the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the court’s 17 regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. 18 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for partial summary judgment 19 (summary adjudication), the parties are ordered to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, to 20 discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. In addition to complying with the requirements 21 of Local Rule 260, the parties must prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, which 22 identifies all relevant facts subject to agreement by all parties. The moving party is 23 responsible for filing the joint statement concurrently with the motion. In the notice of motion, 24 the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as ordered above or provide 25 a statement of good cause for the failure to do so. 26 VI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 27 The undersigned requires parties to participate in a court-supervised settlement conference 28 with a settlement judge before the action may proceed to trial. A settlement conference has not 1 been set at this time. At any time before the final pretrial conference, the parties may file a joint 2 request that this action be referred to a settlement judge for the setting of a settlement conference. 3 If the parties have not participated in a court-supervised settlement conference by the time of the 4 final pretrial conference, the court will refer the action at that time to the assigned magistrate 5 judge for the setting of a settlement conference. The parties shall contact the designated 6 settlement conference judge’s chambers to ascertain that judge’s settlement conference 7 procedures, including the procedure for submitting confidential settlement statements, which shall 8 not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge. 9 Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the attorneys who will try the case 10 shall appear at the settlement conference. Pertinent evidence to be offered at trial, documents or 11 otherwise, should be brought to the settlement conference for presentation to the settlement judge. 12 Of course, neither the settlement conference statements nor communications during the settlement 13 conference with the settlement judge can be used by either party in the trial of this case. 14 Absent permission from the court, in addition to counsel who will try the case being 15 present, the individual parties shall also be present, and in the case of corporate parties, 16 associations or other entities, and insurance carriers, a representative executive with unrestricted 17 authority to discuss, consider, propose and agree, or disagree, to any settlement proposal or offer 18 shall also be present. If for any reason the representative with unlimited authority cannot attend, 19 such a person must be available by phone throughout the conference. In other words, having 20 settlement authority “up to a certain amount” is not acceptable. 21 VII. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 22 The final pretrial conference is set for May 21, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. before District Court 23 Judge Dale A. Drozd by Zoom. Parties will receive a Zoom ID number and password for the 24 final pretrial conference by email from Judge Drozd’s Courtroom Deputy Pete Buzo 25 (PBuzo@caed.uscourts.gov). Any other interested parties or members of the public may access 26 the conference telephonically by dialing 888−557−8511 and using access code 9683466, at the 27 time of the conference. Because several matters may be set for the same afternoon, the parties 28 ///// 1 will be notified in advance of the conference at what specific time the court anticipates calling 2 their case so they can join the Zoom at that time. 3 The parties are directed to file a joint pretrial statement, carefully prepared and executed 4 by all counsel, that complies with the requirements of this Local Rule 281 and Judge Drozd’s 5 Standing Order. Counsel shall also email a copy of the joint pretrial statement in Word format to 6 Judge Drozd’s chambers at dadorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 7 The parties’ attention is directed to Local Rules 281 and 282. This court will insist upon 8 strict compliance with these rules. At the pretrial conference, the court will set deadlines to file 9 trial documents, including motions in limine, trial briefs, and proposed jury voir dire, instructions, 10 and verdict forms (where applicable). 11 VIII. JURY TRIAL 12 A jury trial is set for July 29, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before District Court 13 Judge Dale A. Drozd. The parties have not provided an estimate of the number of court days 14 anticipated for the trial of this case. 15 IX. REQUEST FOR BIFURCATION, APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER, OR 16 OTHER TECHNIQUES TO SHORTEN TRIAL 17 The parties have not made any such requests at this time. 18 X. RELATED MATTERS PENDING 19 There parties have not alerted the court to any related litigation. 20 XI. OBJECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER 21 This case schedule will become final without further order of the court unless 22 objections are filed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. The schedule, once 23 final, shall not be modified except by leave of court upon showing of good cause. The assigned 24 magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery dates to the extent any such 25 modification does not impact the balance of the schedule of the case. 26 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 27 Procedure, no stipulations extending scheduling requirements or modifying applicable rules are 28 effective until and unless the court approves them. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone 1 | does not constitute good cause. Any request or stipulation to modify this scheduling order must 2 || set forth: 3 (1) the existing due date or hearing date as well as the discovery cutoff date, the last 4 date for hearing motions, the final pretrial conference date, and the trial date; 5 (2) whether there have been prior requests for extensions, and whether these were 6 granted or denied by the court; and 7 (3) specific, concrete reasons supporting good cause for granting of the extension. For 8 example, if the reason for the requested extension is that it “will promote 9 settlement,” the requesting party or parties must indicate the status of ongoing 10 negotiations, i.e., have written proposals been exchanged; is counsel in the process 11 of reviewing a draft settlement agreement; has a mediator been selected. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: _ December 2, 2022 □□□ A. 2, eel 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICY JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28