(PC) Shropshire v. D'Agostini ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN NEIL SHROPSHIRE, No. 2:21-cv-0466 WBS DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JOHN D’AGOSTINI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former1 county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he received inadequate dental care while 19 incarcerated in El Dorado County. 20 On October 6, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objection to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 31.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 1 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address dated October 26, 2021, stating his new address and 25 indicating that his release from custody was imminent. (ECF No. 15.) Review of the El Dorado County inmate locator website indicates that plaintiff is no longer in custody. The court may take 26 judicial notice of information stored on the Shasta County Sheriff’s inmate locator website. See In re Yahoo Mail Litig., 7 F. Supp. 3d 1016, 1024 (N.D. Cal. 2014) (a court may take judicial 27 notice of information on “publicly accessible websites” not subject to reasonable dispute); Louis v. McCormick Schmick Restaurant Corp., 460 F. Supp. 2d 1153, 1155 fn. 4 (C.D. Cal. 2006) 28 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 | ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2022, are adopted in full; and 5 2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 6 || Dated: December 5, 2022 44 4 , . ak. AY / 7 WILLIAMB.SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 5 /shro0466.803 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28