(PS) Donnell v. California Highway Patrol ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRISHA MEJIA DONNELL, No. 2:21-cv-01974-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, (ECF No. 5) et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On March 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 19 No. 5), which were served on the plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 21 filed. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 23 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 24 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 25 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 26 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 28 ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 4 Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 || DATED: May 16, 2022. 7 g ( eae Murl □ q_/ 9 CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28