Estate of Jacob Apodaca v. County of Merced ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF JACOB APODACA, , et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00171-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 23) 14 COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The stipulated protective order filed on October 27, 2023, (ECF No. 23), is 23 ENTERED; 24 2. The provisions of the parties’ stipulation and this protective order shall remain in 25 effect until further order of the Court; 26 3. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States 27 District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be filed 28 under seal will require a written request which complies with Local Rule 141; 1 4. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show 2 either good cause or compelling reasons to seal the documents, depending on the 3 type of filing, Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 4 2009); Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 5 2016); and 6 5. If a party’s request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the Court, 7 then the previously filed material shall be immediately accepted by the court and 8 become information in the public record and the information will be deemed filed 9 as of the date that the request to file the Protected Information under seal was 10 made. 11 Db IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 13 | Dated: _ October 27, 2023 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28