Doe v. Rodriguez ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01569-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 MOTION TO PROCEED v. PSEUDONYMOUSLY WITHOUT 13 PREJUDICE TO RECONSIDERATION GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., WHEN DEFENDANTS APPEAR AND 14 REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE Defendants. OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON- 15 OPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF APPEARANCE 16 (ECF No. 6) 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 On December 5, 2022, Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”), filed this action. (ECF No. 1.) On 21 December 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion to proceed by pseudonym. (ECF No. 6.) 22 On December 8, 2022, this action was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Gary Austin to 23 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (ECF No. 7.) For the reasons explained herein, the Court 24 shall grant the Plaintiff’s motion to proceed by pseudonym, subject to reconsideration of the 25 issue when the Defendants appear in this action. 26 II. 27 LEGAL STANDARD Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that every complaint must 1 include the name of all parties. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Rule 17 further provides that “[a]n action 2 must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(a)(1). 3 The normal presumption is that the parties will use their real names, which is “loosely 4 related” to the public’s right to open courts and the rights of individuals to confront their 5 accusers. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools (“Kamehameha Schools”), 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th 6 Cir. 2010). However, courts have allowed a party to proceed in anonymity where special 7 circumstances justify the secrecy. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp. (“Advanced 8 Textile Corp.”), 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000). In the Ninth Circuit, a party may proceed 9 with the use of a pseudonym “in the ‘unusual case’ when nondisclosure of the party’s identity ‘is 10 necessary . . . to protect a person from harassment, injury, ridicule or personal embarrassment.’ ” 11 Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d at 1067-68 (quoting United States v. Doe, 655 F.2d 920, 922 12 n.1 (9th Cir. 1981) (alteration in quoting source)). The Ninth Circuit held that “a party may 13 preserve his or her anonymity in judicial proceedings in special circumstances when the party’s 14 need for anonymity outweighs prejudice to the opposing party and the public’s interest in 15 knowing the party’s identity.” Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d at 1068. 16 Courts have generally allowed a party to proceed with anonymity in three circumstances: 17 “1) when identification creates a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm[;]” 2) where it is 18 necessary “to preserve privacy in a matter of sensitive and highly personal nature[;]” and 3) 19 where the party is “compelled to admit [his or her] intention to engage in illegal conduct, thereby 20 risking criminal prosecution[.]” Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d at 1068 (internal citations 21 omitted). Because the “balance between a party’s need for anonymity and the interests weighing 22 in favor of open judicial proceedings may change as the litigation progresses . . . where the 23 plaintiffs have demonstrated a need for anonymity, the district court should use its powers to 24 manage pretrial proceedings [Rule 16(b)], and to issue protective orders limiting disclosure of 25 the party’s name [Rule 26(c)], to preserve the party’s anonymity to the greatest extent possible 26 without prejudicing the opposing party's ability to litigate the case.” Advanced Textile Corp., 27 214 F.3d at 1069. 1 III. 2 DISCUSSION 3 The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff’s application. Plaintiff requests to be permitted to 4 proceed by the pseudonym “Jane Doe” in place of her true and correct name because this action 5 involves allegations of sexual assault, rape, and attempted sodomy by a correctional officer, 6 while she incarcerated at Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, California. (Pl.’s 7 Mot. (“Mot”), ECF No. 6 at 1-2.) Plaintiff is no longer in custody and wishes to maintain her 8 privacy and not be publicly named or identified in this action. (Mot. 2; Decl. Jane Doe Supp. 9 Mot. (“Doe Decl.”), ECF No. 6-1 at 1.) Plaintiff believes the issues in this litigation are highly 10 sensitive and personal in nature, such that disclosure of her identity would raise a serious risk of 11 psychological and emotional harm. (Mot. 3; Doe Decl. ¶ 4.) Plaintiff does not believe that 12 proceeding by a pseudonym will be prejudicial to Defendants, since she has already disclosed 13 her true identity to Defendants prior to filing this action and will disclose her true identity to 14 Defendants during the course of this litigation, including during pre-trial discovery. (Mot. 2-3.) 15 The Court finds good cause to grant the motion at this time, given the proffered reasons 16 and because of the proffer that her identity has already been disclosed to Defendants. Doe v. 17 Rose, No. CV-15-07503-MWF-JC, 2016 WL 9137645, at *1 (C.D. Cal. June 17, 2016) (“Courts 18 have generally permitted plaintiffs to proceed anonymously when their claims involved 19 allegations of sexual assault or rape.”). Nonetheless, the Court shall keep the issue open to 20 reconsideration once the Defendants have appeared in this action. See J.I. v. United States, No. 21 118CV00363LJOSAB, 2018 WL 1474355, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2018) (“[T]he Court finds 22 that, at this stage of the litigation, Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in partial anonymity. However, 23 the Court will reconsider the matter should the defendants choose to object once they have 24 appeared in this action and articulate why anonymity is not appropriate under the standards set 25 forth above.”). 26 IV. 27 CONCLUSION AND ORDER 1 | anonymity in this case outweighs countervailing considerations at this time, subject to 2 | reconsideration when Defendants appear in this action. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed by pseudonym, (ECF No. 6), is GRANTED, subject 5 to reconsideration when Defendants appear in this action; and 6 2. Defendants shall file an opposition, objection, or statement of non-opposition to 7 Plaintiff proceeding by pseudonym in this action within twenty-one (21) days of 8 appearing in this action. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _December 12, 2022 _ Of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28