C.O. v. County of Kern ( 2022 )

1 DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ., SBN: 096625 CHANTAL TRUJILLO, ESQ., SBN: 289493 2 VICTORIA HARP, ESQ., SBN: 323937 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 3 A Professional Law Corporation 1128 Truxtun Avenue 4 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Phone (661) 323-1400 Fax (661) 323-0132 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 6 C.O. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 C.O., ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01338-JLT-BAK 12 ) (EPG) ) 13 ) Plaintiff, ) 14 ) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 15 vs. ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) 16 ) ) 17 COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY MICHAEL ) ) 18 CLARK, and DOS 1 TO 100, inclusive, ) ) 19 )_ Defendants. ) 20 ) ) 21 ) Complaint Filed: September 18, 2020 ) 22 ) ) 23 24 BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, THROUGH THEIR 25 COUNSEL OF RECORD: 26 27 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a settlement has been reached between the Parties. 28 1 The Parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of 2 Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (A) (ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiation 3 settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all 4 claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own 5 attorney’s fees and costs. 6 7 8 9 Dated: May __, 2022 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 10 11 12 BY:_______________________________ VICTORIA HARP, ESQ. 13 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 14 15 Dated: May __, 2022 OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL 16 17 18 BY:_______________________________ 19 KATHLEEN RIVERA, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 20 21 22 Dated: May __, 2022 ERICKSEN ARBURTHNOT 23 24 BY:_______________________________ 25 MICHAEL LEMAN, ESQ. 26 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 27 28 ORDER The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear ; its own attorney’s fees and costs. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes ; such notice of dismissal effective immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. , City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _-May 17, 2022 [sf heey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE