(PC) Buckner v. Danilowitz ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COURTNEY J. BUCKNER, No. 2:23-cv-1503 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GUY N. DANILOWITZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, now housed in state prison. By an order filed 18 August 1, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a 19 certified copy of his county jail inmate trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to 20 do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has 21 now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required 22 documents. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 24 dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: September 21, 2023 Foci) Aharon 6 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ' fouck1503.fifp 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28