(SS) Barasa Hiten v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN BARASA HITEN, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0473 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 13 v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI1, ) REQUEST TO AFFIRM, AND REMANDING Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE 15 ) PROCEEDINGS ) 16 Defendant. ) (Docs. 21, 22, and 23) ) 17 18 Jonathan Hiten initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for benefits. (Docs. 1, 21.) The matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 The magistrate judge found the ALJ’s decision was “not supported by substantial evidence in 22 the record as a whole and is not based on proper legal standards.” (Doc. 23 at 13; see also id. at 8-12.) 23 Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted and 24 the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Id. at 13-14.) In addition, the 25 magistrate judge recommended that judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against the 26 Commissioner. (Id. at 14.) 27 28 1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the 1 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties on September 7, 2023 anc 2 || notified them that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 23 at 14.) The Court also informed 3 || the parties that “the failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the 4 || ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (/d., quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 5 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) No objections were filed and the time to do so has expired. 6 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 7 || Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 8 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 9 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on September 7, 2023 (Doc. 23) are 10 ADOPTED. 11 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) is GRANTED and the decision c 12 the ALJ is vacated. 13 3. Defendant’s request to affirm the decision (Doc. 22) is DENIED. 14 4. The matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for furthe 15 administrative proceedings. 16 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jonathan Barasa 17 Hiten and against defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 18 and to close this case. 19 20 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 |! Dated: _ September 22, 2023 ( Li pA L. warm 22 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28