(PS) Randall v. Gatestone & Co., International Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA RANDALL, No. 2:20-CV-2019-WBS-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GATESTONE & CO., INTERNATIONAL, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. On March 23, 2022, 19 the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal, within 15 20 days of the date of service of the order, a completed summons and copies of the complaint, and 21 file a statement with the Court within 20 days that said documents have been submitted. Plaintiff 22 was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution 23 and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. More than 20 days have 24 elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied. 25 Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, 26 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 | Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within 14 days 3 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 | objections with the court. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right 5 | to appeal. See Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 7 | Dated: May 20, 2022 Ssvcqo_ 8 DENNIS M. COTA 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28