Commercial Credit Group Inc. v. AMH Logistics, Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 COMMERCIAL CREDIT GROUP, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-CV-1081 AWI EPG 7 Plaintiff ORDER DISOLVING CONTEMPT 8 v. ORDER AND CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF PLAINTIFF’S RULE 41(a)(1) 9 AMH LOGISTICS, INC, et al., REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10 Defendants 11 (Doc. Nos. 48, 60) 12 13 On November 30, 2022, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to provide a status report. See Doc. 14 No. 59. As part of the order, the Court requested that Plaintiff explain whether it wishes to 15 continue to prosecute this case in light of the passage of time and the Defendants’ declarations. 16 See id. 17 On December 7, 2022, Plaintiff responded in part by stating that the contempt order could 18 be dissolved and requesting the Court dismiss the case without prejudice. See Doc. No. 60. The 19 Court construes this request a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads: “the plaintiff may 21 dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing 22 party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]“ Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 23 Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), when properly filed, are effective immediately and do not 24 25 require a court order/court approval. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Yesh Music v. Lakewood 26 Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013); Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 27 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 28 I Here, no answers to Plaintiff's complaint and no motions for summary judgment have been 9, | filed, and it appears that no such documents have been served. Because Plaintiff has exercised its 3 |right to voluntarily dismiss its complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1), this case has 4 | terminated automatically. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)@); Wilson, 111 F.3d at 692. Further, in > light of the representations of Plaintiff and the automatic termination of this case, the Court will ° dissolve the Contempt Order against Defendants. 7 8 9 ORDER 10 Accordingly, IT Is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. As this case has automatically terminated pursuant to Plaintiffs Rule 41(a)(1) notice of 12 dismissal without prejudice (Doc No. 60), the Clerk shall CLOSE this case; and 13 2. The November 3, 2020 contempt order (Doc. No. 48) is DISSOLVED. 14 15 |IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 | Dated: _ December 15, 2022 ZS Cb □□ "SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28