- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BYRON CHAPIN MYERS, No. 2:19-cv-00786-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 K. BATES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. On May 15, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for relief 19 from the court’s order denying his motion to reopen discovery and to defer ruling on defendants’ 20 motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 38. In his motion, plaintiff emphasizes that his prior 21 motion never informed the court that he had actually been able to file another civil action. ECF 22 No. 38 at 2. Instead, plaintiff points out that he merely prepared another civil action to be filed, 23 but he has not been able to print it out or to file it. Id. at 2-4. Plaintiff also restates other portions 24 of his prior motion to reopen discovery, including his difficulties in accessing a typewriter 25 capable of one-handed operation. Id. at 5-8. Lastly, plaintiff argues that because defendants did 26 not oppose the motion, the court should have granted it. Id. at 8-9. 27 Plaintiff relies on Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which allows a party 28 to be relieved “from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for…: (1) mistake, inadvertence, 1 surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence…; (3) fraud…, misrepresentation, 2 or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been 3 satisfied…; or, (6) any other reason that justifies relief.” See ECF No. 38 at 1. Specifically, 4 plaintiff contends that the court’s order should be set aside due to his excusable neglect based on 5 his disabilities and “any other reason that justifies relief.” ECF No. 38. Rule 60(b)(6) is an 6 equitable remedy that applies when there is a reason not within the scope of Rule 60(b)(1)-(5) that 7 justifies granting relief. Community Dental Servs. v. Tani, 282 F.3d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir. 2002). 8 A party invoking Rule 60(b)(6) must demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances which prevented 9 or rendered him unable to prosecute his case.” Id. (citations omitted). 10 Plaintiff’s motion simply quotes passages from his prior motion to reopen discovery and 11 to defer the pending summary judgment motion. However, the court reviewed that pleading in its 12 entirety prior to issuing its order of April 20, 2022. Therefore, plaintiff has not presented any 13 basis to be relieved from the court’s order denying his motion to reopen discovery and to defer 14 consideration of the pending summary judgment motion. Plaintiff clearly disagrees with the 15 court’s April 20, 2022 order, but such disagreement is not grounds for Rule 60(b) relief. As 16 plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating extraordinary circumstances warranting 60(b) relief, 17 the motion is denied to the extent that he seeks to be relieved from the court’s April 20, 2022 18 order. See Community Dental Servs., 282 F.3d at 1168. To the extent that plaintiff needs 19 additional time to file an opposition to the pending summary judgment motion, the court will 20 grant the motion in part and extend plaintiff’s filing deadline. Plaintiff is granted an additional 14 21 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to 22 defendants’ pending summary judgment motion. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion for relief pursuant to Rule 60(b) is denied, in part, and granted, in 25 part, as described herein. 26 2. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file his opposition or 27 statement of non-opposition to the pending summary judgment motion. Failure to 28 comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule ] of Civil Procedure 41(b). 2 3. No further extensions of time will be granted in this matter. 3 | Dated: May 23, 2022 ( aie | / 4 (g—, 4 CAROLYN K DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 12/myer0786.60b.docx 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:19-cv-00786
Filed Date: 5/23/2022
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/20/2024